November 2006

Podcast 4

Click the Play button to hear the Podcast
Trouble? Try clicking this link instead:
http://buccoblog.com/main-blog/media-audio/podcasts/p4.mp3

Podcast #4

– Bradenton County closer to $15m grant to upgrade Pirates facilities
– John Russell takes a new position
– Maxim Magazine’s annual Littlefield rant
– God is back coaching in Bradenton next year
– Verducci tracks young pitcher abuse

Help Wanted: Seeing Eye Dogs

Trivia time — what type of offensive event – single, double, triple, home run, walk, strike out, or stolen base, contributed the most to Pirate wins in 2006?

By the sexy home run, you say? Nope. For example, we did hit one or more HR in 57 of the first 90 games, but we only won 21 of those 57 — 36.8%. That certainly doesn’t correlate with winning.

No, we won a majority of the first-half games the same way we won a majority of all the 67 games we won – with singles, and forcing opposing pitchers to throw more than 16 pitches per inning on average.

It’s pretty easy to understand that as pitch counts rise, the probability of winning also rises in baseball. No surprise there.

But singles? Yep – for the power starved Pirates, anyway. Same with the 2006 Minnesota Twins.

Look at the 2006 Pirates offensive production table:

Event # Gms W L Win %
1 1B per inning or more 90 53 37 58.9%
Less 1B per inning 72 14 58 19.4%
1 or more 2B in game 130 62 68 47.7%
2 or more 2B in game 86 44 42 51.2%
3 or more 2B in game 40 23 17 57.5%
1 or more 3B in game 15 8 7 53.3%
0 HR in game 73 26 47 35.6%
1 or more HR in game 89 41 48 46.1%
2 or more HR in game 39 23 16 59.0%
1 or more IBB in game 38 28 10 73.7%
2 or more BB in game 118 57 61 48.3%
3 or more BB in game 80 44 36 55.0%
1 or more K per IP 53 25 28 47.2%
Less 1 K per IP 109 42 67 38.5%
more 10 K in game 33 13 20 39.4%
16 or less pitches per IP 82 20 62 24.4%
16.1 or more P per IP 80 47 33 58.8%

56% of all Pirate games had an average of one hit or more per inning. That doesn’t mean they actually had one hit per inning – just that they ended up with an average of one per inning. They won 59% of those games. Only the Twins, Angels, and White Sox accomplished that last year. That’s not bad company to be in, huh?

Now look at pitches per inning our batters saw.. if they averaged 16.1 or more in an inning per game, they won 59% of those games too. In games Pirate batters went up hacking, or were dominated, they only won one game in four.

Atlanta, Cleveland, Colorado, Houston, Minnesota, and San Diego pitching dominated Pirate batters last year in a total of 30 games (by dominated I mean a majority of games pitched against us averaged 16 pitches per inning or less on average).

Notice there is only one NLCD team there – Houston. That’s a key point to remember this off season because if the Astros have to rebuild their staff, their dominance over us could very well come to an end. It is too early to tell how any of the NLCD teams will match up with us just yet, but I have to tell you, I’m rather optimistic in that regard.

I also found interesting the walks and strikeout stats in the table. We played nearly two-thirds of our games where we had two or more walks but only won 48% of those. Unless we get that third walk, obviously we’re better off with batters putting the ball in play, even if it goes for an out.

And how ironic is it that the more we struck out per game, the higher our winning percentage was? LoL – actually, there was no reasonable correlation between strikeouts and wins for the Pirates last year that I could determine. To give you an example of what I mean, the Pirates played 8 games where we had 12 K’s, and still won 4 of them.. and played 14 games where we only had 4 K’s in the game, but only won 6 of those.

Dave Littlefield needs to acquire contact hitters. He had the right idea with Sean Casey, unfortunately Casey’s inability to run, his injuries, and his poor defense hurt us pretty bad.

We need players who will sit at the plate and wait for their pitch, then put the ball in play – just singles will do it. We don’t need hired guns to hit 30 home runs. That isn’t going to help nearly as much. We don’t need players who walk a ton – that won’t help either. We need the ball put in play.

Now, as you hear a Pirate rumor about a player we might go after, go to the stats area at MLB.com and pull up that players statistics and divide the number of pitches he has seen the last 2 or 3 years by the number of plate appearances. We don’t want 3.1 – 3.6 guys.. we need 3.8 – 4.2 guys. We also want guys who have at least a .330 career batting average on balls in play and hopefully, much higher.

For instance, Brad Hawpe has averaged 3.9 P/PA the last two and one-half years and has had a .336 BABIP. That’s very good. If we had acquired him, he would have played 1B for us and, I assume, Nady would sit on the pine with his 3.6 P/PA and .305 career BABIP.

That is called upgrading a position, of course. But do Hawpe’s some what inflated Coor’s numbers justify Littlefield spending a starting pitcher for him? I don’t think so, mainly because he offers poor defense.

Ok.. now go scour the rosters and find the best player you can find who sits under the radar, because that is probably who Littlefield will be after – a seeing eye dog. 

Podcast #3

Click the Play button to hear the Podcast
Trouble? Try clicking this link instead:
http://buccoblog.com/main-blog/media-media/podcast-3-112806.wma

Podcast #3

– Kudos to Kip
– A-Rod to the Cubs?
– Tomo Ohka?
– Three Q&A questions answered

Kip Wells and Tidbits

Kip Wells signed with the Cardinals today. Good for the Kipper. Unfortunately, he won’t be able to do much hunting in St. Louis so I wonder what he’ll do in his off time? Kip’s a great person and I wish him luck.

Wells had offers from the Astros and Rangers too but settled on the Cardinals because he has some unfinished business with one team in the NLCD – the Pirates.

Cardinal fans who have emailed about a scouting report on Kip, here is what I have to say: had nice late movement on his 2-seamer that has flattened out the last few years, fringy off speed stuff and had relied way too much on a cutter that didn’t cut, pitches down in the zone, and not afraid to attack inside. He walks way too many.. gives up the bomb at the strangest times.. and isn’t very good at getting out of his jams.

His velocity is significantly down since he first became a Pirate. He was in the 96 mph range now he is lucky to touch 94. Kip’s biggest road block is his mental approach to the game – teams know they have to get to him early because once he feels defeated and relaxes on the mound, he’ll roll off a no-hitter over the next 7 innings.

Here is a quick scouting report from former White Sox manager Jerry Manuel on Kip during a game last year that I archived.

At $4m you can’t go wrong with Kip as a Duncan reclamation project. I tend to believe he is better suited in the pen and that is where I believe the Cardinals will use him the most unless they end up a starter short in 2007.

Kip is a wild dresser so if you want to get in good with him, wear a tie-died paisley silk shirt to the game to get his autograph.

Rumor has it that Ogden Nutting made David Littlefield’s reservation at Disney’s Dolphin Hotel for the GM meetings. It turns out he actually got Dave the largest suite they had, then asked for 8 roll-a-ways for his entourage to sleep on.

The Pirates are reportedly after another pitcher – this time it is Tomo Ohka. Pleeassee.. stop with the PR stuff already.

Industry sources report that Kevin McClatchy may bid on the naming rights for the Nats new stadium. The stadium name Kev has allegedly picked out is: "The Hustle".

Young Starters Under Littlefield

Trivia time.. which starting pitcher currently on the Pirates 40-man roster has won the highest percentage of starts at PNC Park, at age 25 or younger, since David Littlefield became GM?

You’re going to be surprised.

In February 2006, I posted an article titled "Evaluating Rookie Pitchers Second Year Potential" where I guesstimated Maholm and Duke’s ERA for the 2006 season. Unfortunately, I didn’t make any adjustments to their estimates based on the putrid defense or offense Dave Littlefield put behind them.

This year I am going to evaluate the starters a bit differently – I’m going to compare them to their Pirate peers under David Littlefield by age.

The Pirates 2007 rotation will feature at least four pitchers 25-years old or younger.. Snell, Maholm, Duke, and Gorzelanny. Sean Burnett could be a fifth. The question becomes, as a small market team that is attempting to build its foundation on young pitching, how have they fared under David Littlefield, including the 2001 season when he was named GM at the halfway mark?

The Pirates have won 415 games and lost 555 games out of 970 total played since the start of 2001.

Of the 970 games played, 414 were started by 25-year old or younger starters.. 211 at PNC Park and 203 away. Here is the breakdown of decisions earned — wins and losses — by home and away games:

% of % of
Venue/Results Number # starts venue starts 414 starts
Home Win 74 211 35.1% 17.9%
Home Loss 79 211 37.4% 12.6%
Away Win 52 203 25.6% 19.1%
Away Loss 94 203 46.3% 22.7%

The starter received a decision in 299 (72%) of the 414 games. Of those 299 decisions, 42.1% were for a win and 57.9% were for a loss.

Interestingly, the Pirates overall team winning percentage from 2001 – 2006 is just 42.8%. There certainly seems to be some correlation there, considering only 42.7% of all 970 games were started by 25-year old or younger pitchers. Some what random, perhaps, but still.. if young Pirate pitchers were winning at the same pace the team won overall, then the older pitchers have obviously not done much better.

That sort of blows the rational for picking up a veteran starter in Pittsburgh, doesn’t it?

Don’t get me wrong, if the Pirates put Pedro on the mound, his winning percentage is bound to be significantly higher than 42%. However, second-tier type veteran starters haven’t seemed to help much, looking at the big picture.

So why bother to sign a Suppan at $9 per over 3?

We shouldn’t. That’s nuts.. Littlefield and Suppan both know that, and that is why Suppan will never sign here unless Littlefield significantly over pays him, which he shouldn’t do.

Here is the complete list of decisions obtained for starts made by 25-year old and younger Pirate pitchers from 2001- 2006:

<td class="xl25" style="BORDER-LEFT-COLOR: #ece9d8; BORDER-BOTTOM-COLOR: #ece9d8; BORDE

Podcast #2 and Tidbits

Click the Play button to hear the Podcast
Trouble? Try clicking this link instead:
http://buccoblog.com/main-blog/media-media/podcast-2-112706.wma

The second podcast is now up as I continue to iron out the bugs in my studio work (it’s been a long time). This one is significantly shorter (7 minute run time). Topics include the upcoming GM Meetings and what to expect from the Pirates, thoughts on Adam Dunn and Brad Hawpe, and trading Jason Bay.

Chone Smith, of the Angels All The Way Blog and the Baseball Think Factory, has posted his Free Agent Hitter and Pitcher Projections for 2007. Aubrey Huff? .271/.344/.460 at Minute Maid.

The Baseball Think Factory has posted a Poor Man’s Super Linear Weights article that is a very good sabermetric read, if you are into stats.

The Pirates picked up Marte’s option today as we anticipated they would. Interestingly though, Marte signed a two-year deal at $1.3m less than he had in the two team options. That contract is suggestive of a home town discount given to a GM who tells you he intends to deal you to a real team very soon.

I keep hearing media reports the Pirates are not going to offer arbitration to Cota. Today’s Post-Gazette mentions it again. I don’t believe this one bit. I expect Littlefield to offer arb to him because we need a backup catcher and his defensive value is higher than Nyjer Morgan’s offensive value, if you know what I mean.

Jose Castillo is tearing up the Venezuelan Winter League — here is his current VWL stat line: .341/.463/.600.

Pirate fans are starting to drool. Should they?

In 2004, Castillo hit at a .230 EqA pace in Pittsburgh in 383 AB’s. He then went and played in the VWL for the Leones and in 214 AB’s, he raked out an impressive .364/.409/.598 line. Then he came back to Pittsburgh in 2005 and hit at a .239 EqA pace. He tore his MCL in his knee in August and was not able to play winter ball in 2005-2006.

Then last year in Pittsburgh Castillo punched out a .232 EqA. While there was some speculation he came into camp overweight, by May he found his game and finally disproved everyone by ending up with decent offensive numbers (for Castillo) in the first half — .279/.334/.443. But then his world collapsed and he hit just .216/.248/.296 after the All-Star Game, not to mention his extremely poor defense, as he tired out.

While there is no question Castillo has been showing a little bit better plate discipline this winter, part of that can be explained from the significantly higher ERA’s and WHIP’s in the VWL this year compared to when he last played there. Nothing in Castillo’s current stats suggests he is going to put up 95th percentile numbers in 2007. I do believe, however, it will help him to get back on track, much like it did for Endy Chavez last year.

While I am in the camp of believers that thinks Castillo will be a late bloomer, I still only see him as a .250 EqA hitter (.267/.324/.423) at age 30. That isn’t going to work at the major league level.

So, no, Castillo’s numbers in the VWL don’t mean a whole lot other than he might come into camp a bit more focused, and then wear out by July, ending the year with a .240 EqA.

Did you see the fan responses to "Be a GM For a Day" article Ed Eagle posted at pirateball.com?

One fan said:

"This is what I propose: Maholm, Eldred and Damaso Marte to Tampa Bay for Crawford."

Yet another said:

"The first move I would make is to trade Jose Castillo to St. Louis for Chris Duncan"

And yet another said:

"Since Alex Rodriguez thrives in small-market settings, as GM for the day I would try to trade Duke, Maholm or Gorzelanny along with Salomon Torres and Castillo, for A-Rod."

You have to wonder if Eagle dipped in his in-box for the most outrageous, or if Pirate fans are so delusional they actually believe what they said. In any case, Eagle’s article sure made us all look like a bunch of idiots.

Jesse Chavez – the real story

Is he eligible for the draft or not?

I have gone in huge circles from a lot of different people about Chavez. The Post-Gazette reported that Chavez was not left exposed, but they didn’t say why. They probably read the MLB press release and didn’t much care why. Bloggers don’t have the luxury of media credentials to hide behind. I mean, how simple is it to get a media release and then post the contents. Gee whiz.. I need a job like that.

Bloggers have figure things out the old fashion way.. by researching and digging. We WORK for no living. Journalists are handed everything on a silver platter. Ok.. not really.

Anyway, it turns out that some of us have the wrong perception about first year draft rules. Ironically, some of the blame should be cast on incorrect or incomplete media postings on websites, like this one at ESPN:

"First off, note that it’s not the "Rule V Draft," but the Rule 5 draft. It’s called the Rule 5 draft because the section of the Official Rules that covers the draft just happens to be Rule 5 in the book.

Eligibility: A player not on a team’s Major League 40-man roster is eligible for the Rule 5 draft if: the player was 18 or younger when he first signed a pro contract and this is the fourth Rule 5 draft since he signed, OR if he was 19 or older when he first signed a pro contract and this is the third Rule 5 draft since he signed."

Under the new CBA, we knew one additional year had been tagged on to each eligibility opportunity above. The problem is, the determining factor is his age when drafted, not when he signs his contract, as some journalist put on the ESPN website.

Jesse Chavez was 18 when he was initially drafted and Wardell Starling was 19. Chavez has seen four drafts pass since he was initially drafted so, as an 18-year old drafted, he doesn’t have to be placed on the 40-man until next year. Starling was 19 when drafted, has seen four drafts pass, and so he is eligible.

It sure would be nice if MLB allowed us to buy the rule book. Geez..

BB’s First Podcast and Tidbits

Bucco Blog is getting the studio equipment ready for the GM meetings so we pumped out our first Podcast as a beta test. If you have any problems, leave a us a comment please.

(Edit: podcast #1 was as rank as Wiggy at 3B, so we trashed it so save you the grief. Podcast 2 coming to a media player near you soon!)

No, we don’t want Adam Dunn. No, Adam Dunn won’t look good in a Pirates lineup. No, Adam Dunn won’t protect Jason Bay.

Dunn’s stats have fallen hard the last two years. But few Pirate fans seem to know that Dunn has hit fewer home runs at PNC Park in his career than any park in MLB (more than 10 AB’s at a park) – one every 61 AB’s in well over 100 AB’s. In fact, Dunn’s career SLG at PNC is only .366.

Now add onto all that misery is the fact that Jose Castillo had a better clutch hitting rate than Dunn did last year, toss in all his K’s coupled with a $10m salary next year and hey, the Reds can keep Adam Dunn, unless they would take Morgan in a trade. Bay certainly won’t be protected using Dunn.

Brad Hawpe this, Brad Hawpe that, blah-blah-blah. If the Pirates were trying to corner Hawpe, it would be a done deal – they wouldn’t be passing stale info to a beat reporter.

Littlefield wants the Braves LaRoche.. not Hawpe.

Jason Marquis, Shawn Chacon, or Tony Armas?

None. They are all putrid. Armas perhaps the least putrid of them all. Why waste the money with the team we are going to field anyway?

Instead, let’s hope the Cubs sign Marquis, the Reds sign Armas, we release Chacon and bank the money, and JVB and Burnett can heave the ball for 15 starts each. If not, let Youman pitch. Who cares – we’re going to lose 100 anyway – we might as well evaluate the kids again.

You know how to get 2m fans to show up at PNC Park next year with a 100 loss team? Play the position change game.

Imagine Eldred as a starting pitcher.. Jason Bay playing SS.. Torres in CF.. or Doumit closing. I mean, if we are going to be putrid, let’s have some dang fun. How many batters are going to sit comfortably in the batter’s box with Eldred or Doumit on the mound? j/k of course.

I think David Pinto has a major hole in his PMR system this year. He just rated Jose Castillo as the 18th best 2B in MLB last year stating that he produced just 4 fewer outs than predicted. Now that was after he said Burnitz did a better job in RF than Nady and that Nate McLouth was nearly as good in CF as Chris Duffy.

David – you need to find a new stats provider because the cats charting ball in play data at BIS are obviously sleeping through Pirates games.

3 million hits and rolling!

I went back and compiled the server traffic statistics since I opened the doors here a little over a year ago and I was shocked to see I had over 3 million hits – more than 700k of them unique! Un – believable.

Here is last week’s activity showing unique hits to give you an idea:

I’m often asked if I will accept banners and I have always said no. But I want to give back to the community the best way I can here by offering any business in Pittsburgh the opportunity to add a banner to the site that will rotate with others.

Free.

No strings attached and no guarantees.

I do reserve all right’s to the program from banner acceptance, to length of time rotated, to the type of business accepted. All of this is subject to MLBlogs approval, of course.

Please remember that Bucco Blog is an official affiliate of the Pittsburgh Pirates organization with unofficial opinions, so keep the banners family oriented.

Banners should be in GIF format, no larger than 150 pixels wide by 125 pixels long, and should be under 40k in size. If you need help making one, I’ll be glad to assist you.

Send your business name, address, phone number, contact person’s name, best contact time, and a little description about your business – along with your banner or banner request – to me by clicking the link below. You may also ask any questions you have by clicking the link.

Send your banners to bbbanners AT gmail DOT com or just click this link.

Thank you Pittsburgh and here’s hoping for a great year in 2007!

Go Bucs!

Casey Rogowski

The Pirates are not going to sign an A player in Pittsburgh to fill our lefty McThump need. Even most B players would prefer signing somewhere else. So the only way we’ll fill our need is with a trade.

Casey Rogowski is one player who might be able to fill that need.

He is 25-years old, 6′ 3", and somewhere between 230 and 260 depending on who you listen to. Like Eldred, he is quick on his feet for such a big man but unlike Eldred, his defensive game is pretty good.

As a true 1B, Rogowski is buried in the White Sox organization behind Paul Konerko who is signed thru 2010. Knowing they had a future need for a corner outfielder developing, the Sox tried Rogowski in the OF in 2005 and it was a disaster. He’s a 1B, will always be a 1B or DH, and that is all she wrote.

While Rogowski repeated high-A from 2002 – 2004, the reason for that was because he had labrum surgery and really wasn’t healthy until 2004.

In 2005 he was in AA and raked up an impressive .293/.374/.444 line with 20 steals, 58 walks, and one out of three hits went for extra bases.

In 2006 at home run hitting friendly Charlotte, he hit .272/.351/.436 with 76 rbi’s in 459 AB’s, walked 53 times, and stole an incredible 26 bases. But what is interesting about his numbers there was the fact he hit 32 doubles in a park that is notoriously hard to hit doubles in (.86 park factor last 4 years for doubles).

But that’s not even the best part about Rogowski.

He’s a pure clutch hitter who raked a .970 OPS with runners in scoring position last year and a .386 batting average on balls in play in RISP opportunities. And he does this every year.

Rogowski hits to the gaps with authority, had a .665 batting average on all balls hit to RF last year, and he had 38% of all his hits go for extra bases last year.

Rogowski fits PNC Park like a glove, especially against right-hand pitching. He won’t hit 30 home runs but he will drive in runs. His power will continue to develop as he gets older.

And with him buried behind Konerko, his trade value shouldn’t be too high. I don’t see where we match up on the big league roster other than perhaps a Grabow package, but they might be talked into a Stansberry/Davis deal or some pitching prospects in the farm.

The key here is that he is young, he fits PNC Park, he fits the Pirates needs, and he won’t cost us any of our starters. More importantly, he puts the ball in play when men are on base, which is something we desperately need.

Here is some more information for you to look at:

Article in the Detroit News

A video of him at bat hitting a HR in the SAL ASG

An audio interview of him about his game in 2005

His player card at Minor League Baseball

His player card at Baseball Prospectus (only updated thru 2005 right now)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Home Wins Home Losses
# Win % # Losing %
Burnett 4 57.1% Vogelsong 3 100.0%
Duke 13 54.2% Beimel 5 50.0%
Snell 8 42.1% Snell 9 47.4%
Arroyo 3 37.5% Perez 17 44.7%
Maholm 6 35.3% Gorzelanny 3 42.9%
Perez 13 34.2% Anderson 8 42.1%
Fogg 5 33.3% Williams 7 41.2%
McKnight 2 33.3% Fogg 6 40.0%
Van Benschoten 1 33.3% Wells 7 38.9%
Anderson 6 31.6% Arroyo 3 37.5%
Beimel 3 30.0% McKnight 2 33.3%
Wells 5 27.8% Duke 6 25.0%
Williams 4 23.5% Burnett 1 14.3%
Gorzelanny 1 14.3% Maholm 2 11.8%
Away Wins Away Losses
Wells 7 36.8% Van Benschoten 2 100.0%
Snell 7 36.8% Beimel 9 69.2%
Fogg 7 36.8% McKnight 4 66.7%
Arroyo 3 33.3% Burnett 4 66.7%
Maholm 5 26.3% Anderson 9 60.0%
Perez 8 25.0% Gorzelanny 3 60.0%
Duke 5 20.8% Arroyo 5 55.6%
Anderson 3 20.0% Williams 8 50.0%
Gorzelanny 1 20.0% Maholm 9 47.4%
Williams 3 18.8%